GMO Demonstration Success

by Harry P

Anti GMO Demonstrations

Anti GMO Demonstrations

On the weekend of 25 May, there were several anti GMO demonstrations across the world. People got onto the streets, put their personal differences aside and united in their stand against global GMO manufacturers.

No spring uprising or militant tactics, just old fashioned street demonstrations with moms, dads and kids from all the continents. There were many great photos, reasonable press attention, a sense of well being of getting out there and doing something about it.

After the weekend, there was press coverage saying that Monsanto was withdrawing from Europe as there was no broad acceptance.

Victory for anti GMO campaigners? Wrong

Monsanto is a hundred year old company.

They have been through several big and small wars (as a supplier of some toxins), local and global recessions, billions of Dollars of lawsuits (for and against), a good few presidents, hundreds of congress members, some seriously toxic products, some seriously controversial products, good and bad public relations, epic environmental contamination, influential lobbyists, high profile government employees (in and out) and some very serious lobby money.

And where are they today?
They have global number 1 selling products, billions in profits, serious access to global leaders, serious financial backing, very wealthy and influential shareholders, and cutting edge technology in essential food products.

Do you really think that a weekend out with a few banners is going to change anything with a company that has this kind of experience, hardiness and power?

A few novice shareholders at shareholder meetings will raise their hands and say that all these anti GMO demonstrations will affect the performance and security of their shares.

All the board has to say is "Don't worry. It is business as usual for us. We have been through a lot worse and look where we are today ... we have the history to prove it". People like Bill Gates probably will not even bother to attend shareholder meetings - as a seasoned shareholder, he knows it is business as usual.

Not only this, but GMO has broad support by industrial farmers, governments and big business. The question is ... Do our demonstrations have enough power to actually shift any of these 3 pillars that are really essential to have any meaningful impact on global GMO usage?

Unlikely, and for now, it is business as usual for Monsanto. If there was a real threat, Monsanto damage control would have kicked in and mainstream press would have been all over it. Tactfully, Monsanto acknowledged GMO resistance but has not changed strategy.

They don't need to because consumer behaviour is predictable and when our attention is focused on something else, they will get their documents signed. They are good at this and are getting better at it. (Google are also getting very good at consumer predictions and is a growing business model for retailers, for example, consumers are predicted to buy drinks when there is a shift in temperature and retailers will then adjust their products to meet the prediction)

Some 10 years ago, Monsanto was looking at terminator seed technology. The plant from a terminator seed dies after its first harvest and basically ensures that new seed has to be purchased for the following season. There was resistance and uncertainty to this technology and Monsanto "backed" down from commercialising it because, amongst other factors, they did not want to tarnish the squeaky clean GMO corporate image which was still relatively new to the world.

In mid 2000, some years later, after all the fuss had died down, they went ahead with acquiring the technology anyway - this time there was no fuss.

Just recently, they slipped in the popularly named "Monsanto Protection Act" while the world was focused on gay rights. This slipped through with barely any attention and was only picked up after the weekend gay rights celebrations.

Unfortunately it was too late to do anything about it. (Ironically, the only other industry to enjoy this "licence to kill by trial and error" is the vaccine industry)

Monsanto is a company with exceptional timing, especially when it comes to controversial decisions. Here are some examples :

  • Terminator seed discussions resulted in strong opposition. A few years later, it is slipped in under the radar. Good timing Monsanto.

  • The Monsanto Protection Act would have been outrageous to even talk about it. It was slipped in under the radar while the public were celebrating gay right victories. Good timing Monsanto.

  • Global anti GMO demonstrations around the world in May 2013 resulted in perceived victory, especially in Europe. The reality is that in June 2013, Europe will probably approve Monsanto's new Superstax GMO product while the demonstrators recover from their success hangover. Good timing Monsanto.

Just recently, an Oregon farmer alerted the world that a strain of Monsanto's herbicide resistant wheat landed on his field. Nearly 10 years ago, Monsanto said that they abandoned field trials of this strain and destroyed all of the material (GMO products can only be destroyed - it cannot be undone when there are problems) As I am aware, this is the first case where the consequences of GMO contamination have been exposed on this level.
  • Monsanto does not know how or why it happened

  • We don't know how widespread the contamination is

  • Has it affected other plants

  • Why were the trials abandoned nearly 10 years ago (apparently it had something to do with commercial viability but given recent global corporate reputation to scandals, this may not be true)

  • Are there any health implications that may affect our world and everything on it

  • What is the economic impact (the price of wheat dropped upon hearing the news and Japan suspended wheat imported from the US)

  • Civil lawsuits for compensation against Monsanto are now being launched because of negligence

Monsanto is developing a reputation for well timed events - is this a distraction for something else or will the real reason for the Monsanto Protection Act become known (nobody really knows why Monsanto slipped this into the system in the first place - big companies don't push through controversial acts for no reason)

Monsanto is an animal of epic proportions, wit, experience, tactics, muscle and skin thickness and winning the battle against this beast will need a globally united, tactical and coordinated approach that hits their pocket. Money talks in the corporate world.

If the world really does want to stop GMO foods, then the methodology to make these GMO manufacturers stop will have to be different because for Monsanto, this is business as usual and their quarterly profits will prove it.

Comments for GMO Demonstration Success

Click here to add your own comments

More Anti GMO and SmartStax Information
by: Anonymous

Research has shown that genetically modified foods can lead to serious health problems, such as the development of cancerous tumors, infertility and birth defects.

In the United States, the FDA, the agency responsible for ensuring food security of the population, is directed by Michael Taylor, former vice president of public policy for Monsanto.

Also at the USDA, Agricultural Department of the United States, is the chief Roger Beachy, former director of Monsanto.

Recently, the U.S. Congress and President Obama passed the bill HR933, better known as Monsanto Protection Act which, among other things, denies authority to the federal courts to stop the planting and sale of GM crops that pose a risk to the health of consumers.

On 10 June 2013, the EU Commission and representatives from EU Member States are set to discuss and probably vote on the market authorisation of the genetically engineered maize, SmartStax, for use in food and feed.

SmartStax was invented to combat insect resistance to the single toxin used in current BT GMO corn. SmartStax has 6 toxins to improve insecticide effectiveness.

SmartStax Maize / Corn Summary :
  • combined from three genetically engineered crops
  • inherits DNA from around a dozen organisms and artificial genes
  • produces several toxins
  • loaded with residues from several herbicides

There are suspicions that this GMO corn is already (illegally) in Europe and that this authorisation is merely a rubber stamp to prevent embarrassment of the EU regulatory system.

Independent testing organisations have already highlighted flaws in the application process and their own tests have shown this GMO corn / maize to be unsafe and more testing is required.

So far, the EU Commission (headed by Commissioner Tonio Borg) has not acknowledged or accepted any of these concerns.

Maybe there are 2 sides to the story and Mr Borg could clarify the situation (and all the concerns) so that all parties are satisfied - consumers, campaigners and scientists.

This is the article from Test Biotech that explains their concerns and also provides a link for a petition with the EU Commission.

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to What's Your Story.