Vaccine information, good or bad?

>Home Page >>Vaccine Information


Search

Use the breadcrumb menu to navigate or use the SEARCH icon on the left - follow the Moyo path

More and more Governments around the world are forcing vaccination despite increasing evidence of the harm it causes, and even the relevance of the programs themselves. They use heavy handed tactics like not allowing your children to enter schools, not allowing access to social programs and not allowing entry into country's.

Two recent examples were in Italy and Germany.

It is very unlikely that the world is not pro-health, or pro-vaccines for that matter, but many people are increasingly concerned by the rising incidences, suppression and ridiculing of risk information associated with vaccines.

If Governments wish to raise the declining "herd immunity" among their populations, it would be prudent to remove the increasing suspicions, lack of accountability and lack of transparency surrounding vaccine research, testing and implementation.

If not, do we need to start moving elsewhere to avoid these anarchist directives?

What is "herd immunity"?

Using measles, as an example that is making mainstream headlines, the MMR vaccine (the vaccine used against measles) requires a 90 percent or greater vaccination rate to provide herd immunity. This is according to the CDC - US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

However in China, with a vaccination rate of 99%, they still continue to experience measles outbreaks. This obviously brings into question the theory behind herd immunity and why, with this available information, is more research not being done into finding out if this theory could be potentially wrong?

This begs another question, what else could be wrong in the vaccination business?

With this specific herd immunity anomaly, someone is trying to get better vaccine information and a Chinese study has highlighted the measles outbreaks to pollution, and not necessarily the below 90% vaccination rate.

China experiences very high levels of air pollution and this research has found that increased exposure is significantly related to measles outbreaks. Further, air pollution has previously been linked to suppression of our immune system.

Additional research therefore suggests that measles alone is not capable of inducing disease and that a host of other factors are also involved.

While this very polarised lack of synchronisation, between the powers that be, continues to circulate, one should not forget the undeniable crux of the vaccine information (or dis-information) matter, which is ...

In 2011, the US Supreme Court ruled that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” whilst the World Health Organization (WHO) states “There is no such thing as a “perfect” vaccine which protects everyone who receives it AND is entirely safe for everyone.”

It is therefore more imperative than ever that we fully understand if vaccines are really in our best interest or not.

June 3rd marks International Vaccine Injury Awareness Day, an initiative of the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance (EFVV), to show support for those injured by vaccines.

ANH International has put together a collage of information that stresses how important it is for parents, especially, to be made much more aware of the risks associated with vaccination prior to giving consent to have their children vaccinated.


Suspected adverse reactions to vaccination (2005-2015) in the UK (data from UK medicines regulator [MHRA] following freedom of information request)


Why do Governments pay out for vaccine injury?

Did you know?

Vaccine manufacturers are not held liable for vaccine injuries!


What are possible side effects of vaccines?


Measles or vaccination – which vaccine information is more risky?

Have Your Say

Help us to keep it real.

Comments about your experiences and opinions will go a long way to helping all of us.


Home Page

Vaccine Information (Back to Top)